Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 29 Jan 1997 08:33:14 +0800 (SGT) | From | Ow W K Danny <> | Subject | Re: Too Much ARP-ing |
| |
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997 owner-linux-kernel-digest@vger.rutgers.edu wrote:
> ------------------------------ > > From: "A.N.Kuznetsov" <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru> > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 20:06:14 +0300 > Subject: Re: Too Much ARP-ing > > In article <199701270218.VAA09752@delta.CES.CWRU.Edu> you wrote: > > : This is a typical scenario from tcpdump -p (my machine is jeff): > : 15:30:37.455806 arp who-has hunny.INS.CWRU.Edu tell ins02055.INS.CWRU.Edu > : 15:30:37.455806 arp who-has ins02055.INS.CWRU.Edu tell jeff.krafty.com > : 16:27:55.025806 arp who-has hunny.INS.CWRU.Edu tell b64471.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu > : 16:27:55.025806 arp who-has b64471.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu tell jeff.krafty.com > : 16:27:55.325806 arp who-has rabbit.INS.CWRU.Edu tell b62701.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu > : 16:27:55.325806 arp who-has b62701.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu tell jeff.krafty.com > > : Is this behavior normal? > > It depends on your setup. > > Do you use net aliases on this ethernet? If you do you will have to suffer. > net_aliases are broken in 2.0. > I'm a non-techie running Linux v2.0.27 but I noticed that when using IP-aliases,
route add -host xx.xx.xx.xx eth0:0
my win95 host complained about eth0 hw address conflict, and ifconfig having the same eth0 hw address as the gateway host.
Could this be a hw address conflict?
danny ow
|  |