[lkml]   [1997]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Too Much ARP-ing
On Sun, 26 Jan 1997, Joel D. Kraft wrote:

> >
> >Your ethernet card is in promiscuous mode.
> >
> This was my initial thought. Even if this was so, there is no reason
> for the kernel to ARP someone who just sent an ARP request since ALL the
> information to cache that person was in the request they sent.
> Anyway, ifconfig doesn't seem to think it is in promiscuous mode:
> eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:1D:11:50:1B
> inet addr: Bcast: Mask:
> EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:38/192
> RX packets:7070694 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:1160624 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0x280 Memory:d8000-1

Hmm, dosn't multicast put some cards in promisc mode ?
Small snipit from linux/drivers/net/README.multicast:

PROMISC = This multicasts mode is in fact promiscuous mode. Avoid using
cards who go PROMISC on any multicast in a multicast kernel.

PGP key pass phrase forgotten, \ Overload -- core meltdown sequence
again :( and I don't care ;) | initiated.
/ This space is intentionally left
| blank, apart from this text ;-)

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.030 / U:3.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site