Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 10 Jan 1997 11:26:25 -0600 (CST) | From | "Jake (not the snake) Messinger" <> | Subject | RE: z-Re: Memory deallocation problems |
| |
Ive gone to the Intel website and read up on all the chipsets and nowhere can I find info on how much one or the other can cache. It does say that the vx is a consumer type chipset and the HX is business oriented and 10% faster. (than what I dont know)
On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, Ray Van Tassle-CRV004 wrote: > > > Um, nope, you're wrong. The VX chipset will NOT cache more than 64MB. > > > > Okay, here is the REAL chipset poop, once and for all! > > Intel 430HX Intel 430VX VIA Apollo VP-1/VP-2 > > Max. Cache 512KB 512KB 2048KB > > DRAM Cacheablity 64 or 512MB 64MB 64 or 512MB > > EDO Read Timings 4222/5222 5222/6222 4222/5222 > > (60/66 mhz) > > CPU Write buffer 8QW w/merge 4QW 16QW w/merge > > SDRAM support no yes yes > > So there's more than one version of "Triton II"? How typical of Intel to > create unneeded confusion. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will > Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr. > ________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______ >
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu Houston, Texas http://www.ams.com/~jake ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ (Betcha can't do this on a MAC)
|  |