Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 10 Jan 1997 8:03:35 -0600 | From | "Ray Van Tassle-CRV004" <> | Subject | RE: z-Re: Memory deallocation problems |
| |
Um, nope, you're wrong. The VX chipset will NOT cache more than 64MB.
Okay, here is the REAL chipset poop, once and for all! Intel 430HX Intel 430VX VIA Apollo VP-1/VP-2 Max. Cache 512KB 512KB 2048KB DRAM Cacheablity 64 or 512MB 64MB 64 or 512MB EDO Read Timings 4222/5222 5222/6222 4222/5222 (60/66 mhz) CPU Write buffer 8QW w/merge 4QW 16QW w/merge SDRAM support no yes yes
________________________________________________________ To: jake@ams.com@INTERNET Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu@INTERNET From: jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net@INTERNET on Thu, Jan 9, 1997 11:12 PM Subject: z-Re: Memory deallocation problems
On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Jake (not the snake) Messinger wrote:
> And one other thing. I have 96 megs on a triton II board witht he intel > 430vx chipset. SOmeone on #linux said it wont cache past 64megs. First of > all, is that true, 2nd what exactly did he mean, 3rd, should I be > concerned with it, 4th, is there a better motherboard I should get?
Don't believe everything you read on IRC. He was thinking Triton I. Triton II will happily cache lots more than 64mb if you have enough tag. On a Tomcat I|II|III (popular Triton II board), you can cache up to 64mb by default, or 512mb if you buy/install an extra tag chip.
If you had 96mb on a Triton I, the last 1/3 of your RAM would not be cached, and if you actually used that RAM, things would possibly slow down.
------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr. ________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______
|  |