lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: signed int for interrupts??
On Mon, 9 Sep 1996, Marty Leisner wrote:

> Now I'm confused...2**31 is a huge number.
>
> If you have interrupts at 1 Megahertz, (10**6), you still have a big
> enough number for 10*25 seconds of interrupts.

Huge, but not huge enough. This large number of interrupts comes from a
Cyclades multi-port card. When the system is busy (50 or so PPP
sessions), each Cyclades card can generate around 2000 interrupts per
second...about 20x as many as the timer.

64-bit unsigned ints would be nice.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr.
________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.096 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site