[lkml]   [1996]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Can CONFIG_MAX_16M be removed?

On Fri, 20 Sep 1996, Andrew E. Mileski wrote:

> > Since we have the "mem=" command line option to overrride the amount
> > of memory used, is the CONFIG_MAX_16M option necessary anymore? It
> > would seem to me that CONFIG_MAX_16M just causes confusion to new
> > Linux users.
> I'd rather see an option for compiling in the max memory, as some people
> boot linux directly and can't pass anything. This is real simple to add
> too - I'll even do it if necessary.
Don't remove the option. I have an old 386 that uses this setting and
I'd really like to be able to upgrade kernels in the future.


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.070 / U:25.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site