[lkml]   [1996]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Module Versioning Problems: Time for /proc/smp
On Mon, 16 Sep 1996, Alan Cox wrote:

> > In an SMP kernel 'smp_num_cpus' is a _variable_, in non-SMP kernel it is
> > a '#define smp_num_cpus 1', it is neither in ksyms nor can it be
> > checked in a module or insmod.
> >
> > Really, it would be good to have it as _variable_ in both kernel types.
> No it wouldn't. Not from a compiler output and performance viewpoint. The
> bug is in the module stuff failing to discover a difference. We just need
> a way to help it along

Is it time for /proc/smp. I can include this in my patch (_R vs _S for
name mangling).

Which information should /proc/smp contains ?

Jacques Gelinas (
Linuxconf: The ultimate administration system for Linux.

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.085 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site