Messages in this thread |  | | From | Matthias Urlichs <> | Subject | Re: NFS as a module / kerneld question | Date | Sun, 15 Sep 1996 14:46:05 +0100 |
| |
In linux.dev.kernel, article <199609101841.OAA26446@aout.midnight.com>, Peter Desnoyers <pjd@midnight.com> writes: > > If you never use NFS (which I assume is the case, since you're talking about > auto-removing the nfs module) then those processes are indeed going to go > to sleep and never wake up. That's because you're *not using them*. > But what if you _did_ use them (the NFS module was autoloaded, remember?), but not any more (which is why you'd want the kernel/kerneld to auto-remove it)?
IMHO, two of those for each NFS mount (up to some maximum, or whatever) would be much better than a fixed number of four.
NB, is anybody working on a multithreaded server? "nfsd 4" is read-only. :-(
-- Umbilical Cord: Part of a parachute. -- Dictionary of Obscure Medical Terms -- Matthias Urlichs \ noris network GmbH / Xlink-POP Nürnberg Schleiermacherstraße 12 \ Linux+Internet / EMail: urlichs@noris.de 90491 Nürnberg (Germany) \ Consulting+Programming+Networking+etc'ing PGP: 1024/4F578875 1B 89 E2 1C 43 EA 80 44 15 D2 29 CF C6 C7 E0 DE Click <A HREF="http://info.noris.de/~smurf/finger">here</A>. 42
|  |