lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PPro compile
   Date: 	Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:49:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Andrew E. Mileski" <aem@nic.ott.hookup.net>

> Can I ask this dumb question. If , as Intel claims, the PPro performs
> better on 386 code then 486-Pentium code, why does the kernel compile
> with m486 rather than m386?

I've never seen such a claim.

Intel has claimed that 32-bit unsegmented code runs faster though.

One reason that 486-optimized code might be less efficient is that
just about everything is aligned on a 16 byte boundary, so the code's
bloated.

--
Robert Krawitz <rlk@tiac.net> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/

Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf@uunet.uu.net
Tall Clubs International -- tci-request@aptinc.com or 1-800-521-2512

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.072 / U:4.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site