Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Andrew E. Mileski" <> | Subject | Re: NE2000 PCI clones patches: Vote! | Date | Thu, 12 Sep 1996 22:40:06 -0400 (EDT) |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > I think that one of those two patch should be included in the 2.0.x kernel > > since it didnt change the overall stability (both work great). > > Andrew E.Mileski and Jacques share this opinion (the latest prefer the first > > patch described :*), only Paul seem to be reluctant > > I agree with Paul. There is no pressing need to include this in 2.0.x - > it's not a bug-fix, and as such it should wait for 2.1.
Well, since I STARTED all this in the first place <ducks under table>
I agree - this is not a bug fix. But since when has this stopped a patch going into a "stable" kernel if it was of some importance!
> I'm not sure if I like "nbunit=" in general either. > phil
I agree - sounds geeky to me. How about something really difficult to comprehend like "cards=" or "number="? :-)
- -- Andrew E. Mileski mailto:aem@ott.hookup.net http://www.redhat.com/~aem/ Linux Plug-and-Play Project Leader http://www.redhat.com/linux-info/pnp/ PGP public keys are available from http://www.redhat.com/~aem/pgp-keys.txt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBMjjJakXs3rAOyb/9AQH4uQgAws36Q9BQqboQzvBiSh1/RdoL1lnzRDni GJP6IvsQpaof+zNxTvvED8WtWogD6AYSMwDVfn8hpOhkgiWCwSTGjdFEOCI9LaVW OB9nEFAuUXNieZfahCrXzQIiBf8ZQU9sjxq125uyesU1Cdr38o1afL7dfvWTOPUD PjNEX733W1oq3lMRyMIIHui79Z1E2/SZThBmrnCxpKV6isVNZ/G8w2JXP6KSk8KV GgY9iwMu058+kNZt03lvSbLH2/Vmzadzw1RgSjgxQanLKg1XY16A9XTT0mV9ebN7 pQtBPYIpjuPXr224TZv25GfSryYOkiPzrUTloAPlVT5GFQdX3ubMTA== =zRkl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|  |