lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: serial ports
   Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 16:29:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Andrew E. Mileski" <aem@nic.ott.hookup.net>

> The problem with why COM1 and COM3 can't share FIFO is electrical, not a
> matter of software. The problem is that the UARTS for COM1 and COM3 are
> directly driven by the board, and so if both UARTS are active, they end
> up fighting for the line

I wish people would be more careful when making all encompassing
statements like the above. Especially when in that context they
are plain wrong.

Every 2, 4, and 8 multi-uart card I've ever used or seen has the
extra logic required for electrically correct ISA interrupt sharing.

I wish people would *READ* the whole message before sending flames out.
If you had read the rest of the message, you will see that I addressed
multiport serial cards like the AST Fourport and the Bocaboard BB-1004,
BB-1008, and BB-2016. However, I stand by my original statement ---

The reason why you can're share COM1 and COM3 is electrical.
==== ====

This statement says nothing about multi-uart cards (which typically use
different I/O ports and IRQ's than the COM1/2/3/4, to reduce the chances
of port and interrupt conflicts). Multi-uart cards was addressed later
in the *same* *email* *message*. My entire message was was all
encompassing, if you had actually bothered to read it.

Grumble.

- Ted


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.078 / U:2.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site