Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 3 Aug 1996 09:12:08 -0400 (EDT) | From | Mark Levitt <> | Subject | Re: Telnet does not work in 2.0.10 |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, 3 Aug 1996, root wrote:
>Yes, I noticed it as soon as it changed. I disagree with the decission very >much though. If you add a net it gets the netmask from the kernel and adds the >route. So what's wrong in also allowing you to give a host, and if you also indicated >a net route, adding the net that contains that host ? It does not break the old >behaviour and gives you a quite usefull extra way to do things. after you brought up >the interface for your device you just do something like: > route add -net `hostname` ^^^^ Well, it seems to me that this is particularly non-intuitive. If you tell it your adding a network, then giving it a host shouldn't work. So, fixing it so it makes more sense seems like a good idea. Now, maybe another option to route might be appropriate, but I think the change is a good idea.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: PGP Signed with PineSign 2.0
iQCVAwUBMgNQJWo5dQyfZ7u5AQESgwP/c4SVcqUabuuOeBGD0a54XtjJx+xZ2Ti6 WJnlJu/vDYsE37W/NP4yAWAt1wuXV1TOptxkUBvwRoGF2odJhsfQQaZVGDqKKfOD nkr1RY1BQfxDMZ5tTmwgl/afHnp89zqremFuIi4uyRQ6S1B/lvvoXFdIgB/E+rnv ZW/EQmURlrk= =XaQS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ____________________________________________________________________
Mark E. Levitt Department of Speech Communication, Syracuse University E-mail: melevitt@syr.edu Home Page: http://web.syr.edu/~melevitt
PGP fingerprint = B8 A3 AA A6 0F 83 9A BE F2 7A 19 F9 15 79 FE A4 Public key available from http://web.syr.edu/~melevitt/pgpkey.html ____________________________________________________________________
|  |