[lkml]   [1996]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Microsoft FAT 32.
>But imagine your "secure" data in your home dir under NT being readable by
>everybody than boots up this DOS kernel...

Can we say "security through obscurity", boys and girls?

Actually, the FAT 32 as described upthread seems perfectly reasonable
to me. It's the obvious extension of FAT to 32-bit cluster numbers,
which should have happened five years ago. Okay, it still has the
fundamental flaws of FAT, but by making just this change it's possible
to avoid requiring really extensive changes to FAT-reading programs,
including DOS itself.


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.020 / U:5.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site