[lkml]   [1996]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: getting Linux into business..

On Sun, 18 Aug 1996, Bryn Paul Arnold Jones wrote:

> You don't seem to understand, fork() _IS_ clone(0), not equilivent to, not
> like, but IS. I don't see any point in doing fork() based threads now,
> and clone based later, just get the clone stuff done. We could (should
> IMHO) remove fork(2), and implement fork(3).

alright.. howabout getting a clone(0,COPYVM|SIGCLD) threads lib going
first and then finish up a clone(astackptr,SIGCLD) threads lib down the

# Rob McKee ImCom.Com
# SysAdmin 1630 N. Main St. Suite #444
# Imagine Communications Walnut Creek, CA 94596-4609
# (510) 939-1691 BBS (510) 939-1684 Voice
# The best defense is not to have a hay seed for a president

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.029 / U:2.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site