lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: posix 4 extensions
Hi,

On Thu, 1 Aug 96 07:41 CDT, jms@pobox.com (Johnie Stafford) said:

>>>> On Wed, 31 Jul 1996 19:32:19 +0100 (BST), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) said:
>>> What about the posix.4 shared memory objects? Any chance we might ever
>>> see them? The ability to map shared memory segments to the same
>>> logical address in several different processes would make the use of
>>> pointers in shared memory possible.

ac> Both mmap() and SYS5 shared memory can already do that

> That's true, I just think that having a program specify an absolute
> memory location for data to be rather ugly.

Using mmap(), you don't have to. In fact, fixed addressing with
MAP_FIXED in mmap is positively discouraged.

Cheers,
Stephen.
--
Stephen Tweedie <sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Department of Computer Science, Edinburgh University, Scotland.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.057 / U:6.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site