lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: EXT2_FIRST_INO
Hi,

Thanks for your answers.

To sumarize:

Leonard N. Zubkoff <lnz@dandelion.com> wrote:
> You should use e2fsprogs-1.04 with recent kernel sources.

Bryn Paul Arnold Jones <bpaj@gytha.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> The short answer is don't fix defrag, I'd ask Stephen Tweedie
> <sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk>.

Stephen C. Tweedie <sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> Aww, since you're all clammering for it, I'll promote it up my TODO
> list a bit. :)

Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> In the case of defrag0.6, the best way to make the change is pass the a
> pointer to the ext2 superblock to the EXT2_FIRST_INO macro. This will
> allow it to be compatible with future ext2 filesystems where the first
> data inode may no longer be located at EXT2_GOOD_OLD_FIRST_INO.

But I think I can wait a new release of defrag, updated by its author
:-).

Recents e2fsck (1.02 and 1.04) report approx. 4% of non-contiguous files
on my /usr partition (1 year old, without any defrag ever). Is it a
normal value ?

--
Philippe Strauss, CH-1092 Belmont
Private Email: philippe.strauss@urbanet.ch

" Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour.
Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute.
THAT's relativity. " Albert Einstein.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.076 / U:0.916 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site