Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 6 Jul 1996 12:43:53 +0100 (BST) | From | Bryn Paul Arnold Jones <> | Subject | Re: 2.0.1 when? |
| |
On Fri, 5 Jul 1996, Daniel W. Erskine wrote: [...] > Greetings: > Do you know if the new Linux 2.x.x releases will start recognizing Window95's > long filenames? I guess we all could "get along" with the standard F.A.T. that > is supported, but having "true" Win95 support would kinda, "make our day." >
It has since the middle of the 1.3.xx serise: * * Filesystems * Quota support (CONFIG_QUOTA) [N/y/?] Mandatory lock support (CONFIG_LOCK_MANDATORY) [N/y/?] Minix fs support (CONFIG_MINIX_FS) [M/n/y/?] Extended fs support (CONFIG_EXT_FS) [N/y/m/?] Second extended fs support (CONFIG_EXT2_FS) [Y/m/n/?] xiafs filesystem support (CONFIG_XIA_FS) [N/y/m/?] DOS FAT fs support (CONFIG_FAT_FS) [M/n/y/?] MSDOS fs support (CONFIG_MSDOS_FS) [M/n/?] VFAT (Windows-95) fs support (CONFIG_VFAT_FS) [M/n/?] umsdos: Unix like fs on top of std MSDOS FAT fs (CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS) [N/m/?] /proc filesystem support (CONFIG_PROC_FS) [Y/n/?] NFS filesystem support (CONFIG_NFS_FS) [M/n/y/?]
Bryn -- PGP key pass phrase forgotten, \ Overload -- core meltdown sequence again :( | initiated. / This space is intentionally left | blank, apart from this text ;-) \____________________________________
|  |