lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: This fucking thread blows me.

I don't understand the reason as why this needs to be changed???
What so bad about these comments that they feed this entire discussion?
Anyhow, I must agree with Linus's post earlier today on this list.
And to the "fuct" instead of "fucked": I believe that just like the whole
story about the word "darn" - It seems to be accepted, but in the end
you're still cursing, as words are just symbols and if they mean the same
thing they're the same word [To put that in one sentence =)] That would
just make you a cursing hypocrite. So let's please just leave the stuff
in the kernel's comments and not replace it with stupid stuff. What do we
have to loose???

Best Regards,

P.S. I finally changed that subject line, as this topic has simply
nothing to do with the Bible as with Humping..eehhh. Thumper =)

__ _____
/ / _ __ /7 __ _ /_ _/_ _ _ __ Jochen Toppe
n_/ /,'o|,','/ \,'o// \/7 / /,'o| /o| /o|,'o/ Email:jtoppe@cs.uah.edu
\_,' |_,'\_\/n_/|_(/_n_/ /_/ |_,'/_,'/_,'|_( Tel. : (205) 880-1345
// //
---->>> http://fly.hiwaay.net/~jtoppe <<<----

On Wed, 24 Jul 1996, James L. McGill wrote:

>
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Jul 1996, Khan Klatt wrote:
>
> khan} >./drivers/cdrom/mcd.c: that are supposedly "OUT OF TOLERANCE" (but are
> khan} >really shitty presses!)
> khan}
> khan} Replace with crappy.
>
> I prefer 'shiddy'
> passes the grep test :-)
>
>
> khan} >./lib/vsprintf.c: * Wirzenius wrote this portably, Torvalds fucked it up :-)
> khan}
> khan} Torvalds @#$%ed it up :-)
>
> fuct it up
>
> Oo
> \__/
>
> --
> g-r-a-t-e-f-u-l-l-y---[ email:<fishbowl@conservatory.com> ]---l-i-v-i-n-g
> d-e-a-d-i-c-a-t-e-d---[ http://www.conservatory.com/~fishbowl ]-----l-i-g-h-t
>
>
>
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.186 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site