Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Not a bible thumper. . . | Date | Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:46:45 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Lex Spoon" <> |
| |
Jochen Toppe wrote: > > Bible Thumper? Anyhow.... > > # > # Using defaults found in .config > # > * > * Code maturity level options > * > Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers (CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL) [Y/n/?] > System messages featuring finest profanity (CONFIG_VULGAR) [Y/n/?] > * > * Loadable module support > * > .... *ducks* > > Here are my two bits: A natural amount of profanity in the > appropriate places of the code ("Sun blows me"..) are fine, but that > is no incentive to have a kernel which constantly curses, that would > probably get on every users nerve sooner or later. Wasn't there a > proposal to create a curse-kernel? Well, there still is that config > option thing? curse patches? *ducks again*. Mamma mia, I should go now =) > Where is this thread going anyways? Let it be up to Master Linus? >
Woo hoo! Now there's something Linux would have on commercial OS's! It would be so cool to see:
VFS: Shit! Some dumbass took the disk out! (2/0)
And of course, in addition to the config option, we would need a boot time option and a proc config file (for when grandma comes over):
echo "Hell, yeah!" > /proc/vulgarities
OR echo "No, thank you" > /proc/vulgarities
Lex
|  |