Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 20 Jul 1996 04:41:54 -0300 | From | Patrick Main <> | Subject | Subject: Re: 2.0 vs 1.2 and INN config. |
| |
Sorry about messed up formatting in earlier message this should look better
> > Linuxers and Alan, > There has recently been some <?> discussion on the net and admin > lists regarding a cry for help with INN and Linux 2.0 with RedHat3.0.3 > Alan commented that this is a simple task with only "trivial" changes to > config.data for Linux 2.0 However nobody has stated what correct settings > are?? For what it's worth ... here is a comparison of the changes > between a config.data used with a 1.3.32 kernel vs the InnFAQ along with > notes from a RedHat contributed unoff4 .rpm along with a debian > config.data of which the debian is most interesting. > > ALSO: there is a Linux patch with the sources where #include <sys/time.h> > in added to clibrary.h in the include directory of INN. This made the > difference between nnrpd <in.nnrpd> running or not! <DO THE INCLUDE!> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Highlights to the config.data from the distribution config.data for Linux > > SETTING "INNFAQ for1.3.57+" "debian" "RedHat's" "older linux 1.2.x" > > USE_CHAR_CONS DO DUNNO DO DUNNO
> <these next lines are under the C Library differences> > > VAR_STYLE STDARGS STDARGS VARARGS STDARGS > SIZE_T size_t int int size_t > SIGVAR sig_atomic_t int int sig_atomic_t > FORK fork fork fork vfork <!??> > HAVE_VFORK DONT DONT DONT DO <!??> > BIND_USE_SIZEOF DONT DO <!??> DO DONT > CLX_STYLE FCNTL FCNTL FCNTL IOCTL <!??> > NBIO_STYLE IOCTL FCNTL FCNTL FCNTL <!??> > EXITVAL void volatile_void <!??> void void > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > These are the highlights of the differences in config.data(s) > To see all the suggested changes to the distribution's config.data > please retreive the current INNFAQ #9 which claims to list the changes > for Linux kernels 1.3.57+ there are many other settings but the above > are the ones that seem to have some disagreement <?> >
|  |