Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 2 Jul 96 07:25 CDT | Subject | Re: SCSI device numbering | From | (Johnie Stafford) |
| |
>>>>> "am" == Alexandre Maret <amaret@infomaniak.ch> writes:
am> Johnie Stafford wrote: >> >> >>>>> "ac" == Albert Cahalan <albert@ccs.neu.edu> writes: >> ac> No, it is sufficient for everything, including really weird ac> SCSI adapters. Using nibble boundries (for nice hex output), ac> dev_t can be split as follows: >> ac> Purpose Bits Normal Extreme ac> controller 4 <= 1 2 ac> bus 4 == 0 1 ac> device 8 <= 2 4 >> >> What about wide SCSI? It does 16 devices.
am> sorry... that's 8 bits -> 256 devices. It should be enough for am> your ultra-giga-wide-SCSI ;-)
Yes, this proves that I shouldn't read mail under the influence of prescription drugs. :)
Johnie
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Johnie Stafford | Internet E-mail: jms@pobox.com KB5YVF - Lafayette, LA | Ham Radio Packet: kb5yvf@k5arh.#lftla.la.us.noam | WWW URL: http://www.pobox.com/~jms pobox.com for lifetime email -- mail info@pobox.com -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|  |