Messages in this thread |  | | From | (Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr) | Subject | Re: Alternate solutions (Was: Re: NFS still has caching problem) | Date | 16 Jul 1996 19:29:27 GMT |
| |
In article <4sggh6$c0i@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>, Thomas Koenig <ig25@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote: >In linux.dev.kernel, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) wrote: > >>The world is waiting for a decent networked file system with > >>o Security >>o Replication support >>o Fast bulk transfer >>o Low latency > >This is very true. [...] >While we're at it, we also want good performance over slow links, and >at least some atomic operations. > >>I don't see any reason why the Linux community shouldnt write it. > >This calls for immediate discussion (with apologies to Monty Python :-). >Anybody willing to set up a mailing list?
I just setup a mailing-list for discussion about this topic:
new-networked-fs@cosy.sbg.ac.at
to subscribe please mail to majordomo@cosy.sbg.ac.at.
-- Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr can not assert the truth of all statements in this article and still be consistent. <mike@cosy.sbg.ac.at>
|  |