Messages in this thread |  | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: Misc Fixes | Date | Sun, 14 Jul 1996 16:47:25 +0100 (BST) |
| |
> So we have to implement some `immutable memory' mechanism. once the > securelevel is set, it has to be (and the whole page) turned to readonly. > What a waste of valuable memory ! (I hear people complain about kernel > bloat once again :-)
No because then I patch references to securelevel by dereferencing offsets from stuff like sys_open(). We do want an immutable kernel scheme, but thats called "disable module loading".
Alan
|  |