[lkml]   [1996]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Misc Fixes

On Fri, 12 Jul 96 23:55:24 EST, (Gonzalo
Tornaria) said:

> Would it be too bad tu run some parts of the kernel (at least
> modules, perhaps compiled in drivers too) in protection ring 1? Then
> you leave ring 0 for secure compiled-in parts of the kernel. You
> can't modify page tables from ring 1, can you? You put securelevel
> (and perhaps some other things) in a read-only page, and as modules
> are running in ring 1, they can't write to it.

Not all architectures implement such multiple security levels in
hardware. You can't rely on it being available.

Stephen Tweedie <>
Department of Computer Science, Edinburgh University, Scotland.

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.051 / U:9.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site