Messages in this thread | | | From | lilo <> | Date | Sat, 13 Jul 1996 12:12:19 -0500 (CDT) | Subject | Re: modules and securelevel |
| |
On Fri, 12 Jul 1996, Kai Schulte wrote:
> Protecting the kernel against each module would cause a lot of unnecessary > overhead. Is there any good reason why modules should not be "trusted" > code?
If there is, we're all screwed, because they have to be. You've correctly pointed out that once you're a module you can pretty much do anything you want.
lilo
| |