lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Problems with 2.0.5
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Don't even both telling me 2.0.5 doesnt compile. I know, all I dont know
> is who put the strange patch in that breaks it and why it was allowed in
>
> The following appears to be complete garbage since a route doesnt even
> have a "u." substructure.
>
> - dev=rt->rt_dev;
> - route_src = rt->rt_src;
> - atomic_dec(&rt->rt_use);
> + dev=rt->u.dst.dev;
> + atomic_dec(&rt->u.dst.use);
> ip_rt_put(rt);
>
> Alan

Huh? I patched up from 2.0.3 in two steps at once. It built without incident.
What configuration should have caused problems?

- Steve

--
___________________________________________________________
|Steven N. Hirsch "Anything worth doing is worth |
|University of Vermont overdoing.." - Hunter S. Thompson |
|Computer Science / EE |
------------------------------------------------------------


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.079 / U:2.860 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site