lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Current 2.0.0 stability indicator -- FYI
Date
In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.960628200938.15516Y-100000@inorganic5.chem.ufl.edu>,
Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Jun 1996, LD Landis wrote:
>
>> 8:48am up 12 days, 21:28, 4 users, load average: 0.07, 0.03, 0.00
>
>So?
>
>Linux crash 2.0.0 #1 Wed Jun 12 17:16:21 EDT 1996 i486
> 8:24pm up 16 days, 1:14, 1 user, load average: 0.13, 0.03, 0.01
>
>But can it run a few months _with_ heavy load without tripping up? I
>don't think so...since a number of 2.0.0 bugs are already known.

# uptime
10:52am up 47 days, 21:46, 3 users, load average: 0.01, 0.00, 0.00
# uname -v
#3-pre-2.0 Tue May 14 12:25:10 BST 1996

Web server with 50000 hits/day; NFS serving to 1000 users with web pages.

--Malcolm

--
Malcolm Beattie <mbeattie@sable.ox.ac.uk>
Oxford University Computing Services
"Widget. It's got a widget. A lovely widget. A widget it has got." --Jack Dee


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.052 / U:9.924 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site