Messages in this thread |  | | From | (Bjorn Ekwall) | Subject | Re: The symbols from kernel 1.99.14 don't match 1.99.14 | Date | Sun, 9 Jun 1996 12:45:32 +0200 (MET DST) |
| |
James B. MacLean <macleajb@ednet.ns.ca> wrote: > On Jun 7, 1:08pm, Dave Baker wrote: > > >> gcc2_compiled. undefined > > >> [snip] > > >> Failed to load module! The symbols from kernel 1.99.14 don't match 1.99.14 > > isn't this just the bug that requires upgrading to modules1.3.69k ??
Yup! (or just applying my web-page patch for modules-1.3.57)
> At my site > it was due to compiling the kernel with all the CONFIG_MOD... on etc... > but NOT having the first option for allowing experimental options > (CONFIG_EXPERMINTAL).
Strange... Why do _I_ never have any of those problems... :-) Perhaps my setup behaves because of its close proximity to Finland...
OTOH there might be problems with some modules if the _modules_ are guarded by CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. Was that it?
Bjorn <bj0rn@blox.se> <http://www.pi.se/blox/>
|  |