[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: The symbols from kernel 1.99.14 don't match 1.99.14
James B. MacLean <> wrote:
> On Jun 7, 1:08pm, Dave Baker wrote:
> > >> gcc2_compiled. undefined
> > >> [snip]
> > >> Failed to load module! The symbols from kernel 1.99.14 don't match 1.99.14
> > isn't this just the bug that requires upgrading to modules1.3.69k ??

Yup! (or just applying my web-page patch for modules-1.3.57)

> At my site
> it was due to compiling the kernel with all the CONFIG_MOD... on etc...
> but NOT having the first option for allowing experimental options

Strange... Why do _I_ never have any of those problems... :-)
Perhaps my setup behaves because of its close proximity to Finland...

OTOH there might be problems with some modules if the _modules_ are
guarded by CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. Was that it?

Bjorn <> <>

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.140 / U:1.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site