Messages in this thread |  | | From | (James M. Cassidy) | Subject | Undefined references. | Date | Thu, 6 Jun 96 16:11:25 EDT |
| |
I'm trying to compile linux 1.2.13 with gcc 2.7.0 and everything compiles fine until the linking stage where I get a whole bunch of undefined references.
Here as an example of the linking stage:
ld -qmagic -Ttext 0xfffe0 arch/i386/kernel/head.o init/main.o init/version.o \ arch/i386/kernel/kernel.o arch/i386/mm/mm.o kernel/kernel.o mm/mm.o fs/fs.o net/net.o ipc/ipc.o \ fs/filesystems.a \ drivers/block/block.a drivers/char/char.a drivers/net/net.a arch/i386/math-emu/math.a \ /usr/src/linux/lib/lib.a -o vmlinux ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 000fffe0 arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `__edata' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0x1d): undefined reference to `__end' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0x7f): undefined reference to `_x86' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0xa3): undefined reference to `_x86' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0xcf): undefined reference to `_x86' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0xdb): undefined reference to `_x86_model' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0xe4): undefined reference to `_x86_mask' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0xea): undefined reference to `_x86_capability' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0xf4): undefined reference to `_x86_vendor_id' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0xfa): undefined reference to `_x86_vendor_id' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0x100): undefined reference to `_x86_vendor_id' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0x171): undefined reference to `_start_kernel' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0x179): undefined reference to `_hard_math' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0x194): undefined reference to `_hard_math' arch/i386/kernel/head.o(.text+0xc000): undefined reference to `_init_user_stack'-
Then goes on to give some more undefined references in: arch/i386/kernel/kernel.o arch/i386/mm/mm.o fs/fs.o floppy.o
Could anyone suggest what I might have configured wrong to cause lal these undefined references?
P.S.: Please leave the subject line with the Re: so I can spot it easier in my huge mail box.
- Thanks - Jim
|  |