[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Pentium memcpy patch
On Wed, 5 Jun 1996, Chris Evans wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm dubious about using the pentium-memcpy patch as the author says he
> sees bit errors with the patch when operating under high load.
> Can anyone post saying if they are using the patch flawlessly under load,
> or conversely had these problems with the patch?

I've had my Pentium/90 (Intel Zappa MB) running 2 makes and XFree
simultaneously with the 1.3.90 memcpy patch running on pre2.0.10 kernel
release. It seems pretty stable to me. Haven't had any "mysterious"
corruption so I'm sticking with it for now.

Derrik Pates
Win95 isn't the problem - OS/2 and DOS are. Win95 is the answer.
-- also --
Linux is the answer to the same problem.
-- but --
Linux is free.

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.076 / U:1.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site