[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: SCSI device numbering (was: Re: Ideas for v2.1

>Anyway, I think we should be ok with a 12+20 bit dev_t, that sounds like
>the best solution right now.

OK, but the point was that 20 bits for a minor number is insufficient
for a fixed mapping of devices to minor numbers. It would be sufficient
if we wanted to continue to use dynamic mapping of minors to devices, of

This is why I wanted this issue carefully discussed before we
actually do any coding. I know that lots of people don't like dynamic
mapping of minors to devices, and I don't yet have a feel as to whether
people will accept scsidev as a permenant solution or not.

A 64 bit dev_t presents it's own problems of course, but I just
wanted to make sure that we are not forgetting why this discussion got
started in the first place.


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.037 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site