Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: real kernel bloat | From | <> | Date | Tue, 25 Jun 1996 14:38:07 -0400 (EDT) |
| |
> I have a hard time believing it as well. You are correct in saying > it is fat, probably this is the problem. At least in my experience > with Solaris, it requires 24 meg of RAM to run with Linux on 16 > with X and still doesn't seem as fast. > > Check out: > > http://www.base.com/gordoni/os-sizes.html > > You may not have such a hard time believing it after reading that.
I meant I had a hard time believing his AlphaStation was as cruddy as he said it was. I already know about FAT OSes. :)
Melvin
|  |