lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: real kernel bloat
On Tue, 25 Jun 1996, David S. Miller wrote:

> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 20:48:54 +1200 (NZST)
> From: "J. Sean Connell" <ankh@canuck.gen.nz>
>
> [snip]
>
> It is pretty obvious you aren't running SparcLinux yet ;-)
>
No, and since this machine is about a month away from being our #1
machine, we're not going to be, either.

Not that I think badly of SparcLinux; it's just that when you have a
machine whose load average routinely goes above twenty (some days above
40), you kinda wanna have a known good and rock-solid OS behind it. And
even though I can't *stand* Solaris 2.5, I have to credit it with the fact
that in the time we've been running it on this machine, it's never
crashed. The uptime is so low because we've had three hard drives go bad
and a memory upgrade to deal with lately :)

--
J. Sean Connell Systems Software Architect, ICONZ
ankh@canuck.gen.nz "Oh life is a glorious cycle of song,
ankh@iconz.co.nz a medley of extemporanea,
#include <stddisc.h> And love is a thing that can never go wrong...
And I'm Queen Marie of Romania."
I *hate* Sun Type 4 kbs! --Dorothy Parker



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.142 / U:1.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site