[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: When? 64-Bit lseek()?
Thanks for your note Harald! So how "standard" is this? Anyone know?
The man page doesn't betray much (re: POSIX) and also suggests that the
call is limited to 4GB file sizes. I am curious about:

(1) What is the current standard/proposal for 64-bits in POSIX-land?
(the prototype is sufficient for my purposes, don't need all the spec)

(2) What is the current status of 64-bits in POSIX-land?

(3) Anyone know what the expected adoption timeframe by POSIX is?

Harald Koenig wrote:
> > A couple of years ago, I asked the question about having large files
> > (that is 64-bits of addressability). Now that the POSIX definitions are
> > getting close to being real, (and I haven't ever seen them), what is the
> > replacement for lseek(2)? I see that the iNTEL version of linux doesn't
> > go past 32 bits at present, but many current disks are close.
> i386 Linux has a llseek() system call which is used e.g. by fdisk-2.0
> to partition disks >2GB (I've already tested a 4.5G disk, no problem;
> and there are quite a number of nice 9+ GB SCSI disks around; unfortunately
> neither belongs to me :-(
> Harald
> --
> All SCSI disks will from now on ___ _____
> be required to send an email notice 0--,| /OOOOOOO\
> 24 hours prior to complete hardware failure! <_/ / /OOOOOOOOOOO\
> Harald Koenig, \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
> Inst.f.Theoret.Astrophysik // / \\ \
> ^^^^^ ^^^^^

LD Landis ldl@HealthPartners.Com N0YRQ Voice 612/883-5511 Fax 612/883-6363
HealthPartners, 8100 34th Avenue So, PO Box 1309, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1309
Shape your life not from your memories, but from your hopes. (Borrowed)

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.089 / U:1.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site