Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 20 Jun 1996 08:37:16 -0500 | From | (Andrew C. Esh) | Subject | Re: On SIGCHLD signal semantics |
| |
>>>>> "rdm" == rdm <rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu> writes:
rdm> Michiel Boland: >> But Linux is not System V. Linux is Linux. Ergo: these >> applications are broken. Full stop.
rdm> Your logic is A!=B, and A=A, therefore C. This is, at best, rdm> misleading.
Please allow me to correct the logic analysis:
Linux is not System V: A!=B Linux is Linux: A=A (Which underlines the fact that it's not B) These applications (which are System V): C->B (If apps work, then it must be System V) are broken: C, !A (Working apps, so Not Linux)
SO if you want these apps, don't run them on Linux. Looks like logic to me.
(I don't know if any of these points are true, I just needed to test the logic.)
--- Andrew C. Esh mailto:andrew_esh@cnt.com Computer Network Technology andrewes@mtn.org (finger for PGP key) 6500 Wedgwood Road 612.550.8000 (main) Maple Grove MN 55311 612.550.8229 (direct) http://www.cnt.com - CNT Inc. Home Page http://www.mtn.org/~andrewes - ACE Home Page
|  |