lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Alan's bug catalogue
I get those with NE2000 on both eth0 and eth1 ...

On 2 Jun 1996, Winfried Truemper wrote:

> Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk) wrote:
>
> : Why do a lot of the socket destroy delayed people have an SMC ultra - chance
> : or driver bug
>
> I have a
>
> eth0: DC21041 at e400 (PCI bus 0, device 10), h/w address 00:00:c0:c2:e7:c6,
> and requires IRQ10 (provided by PCI BIOS).
>
> and get those messages:
>
> Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=0)
> Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=208)
> Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=208)
> Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=224)
>
>
>
> : Unduplicated
> : ------------
> : acct() disk corruption report.
>
> I reported that. I have to admit that I cannot reproduce the error on my
> home machine (an old 486). [The server at university is too important to
> risk a disk-crash.]
>
>
>
> -Winfried
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.220 / U:0.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site