lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: On SIGCHLD signal semantics
On Tue, 18 Jun 1996, Marc Aurele La France wrote:

> > Well, to the extent that Linux is trying to provide System V
> > compatibility, Linux can also be said to be broken. Yes, applications
> > which assume System V behavior are not POSIX-complaint, and it would
> > probably be better to make them POSIX complaint.

> No, don't contradict yourself. System V SIGCHLD signal semantics *are*
> POSIX compliant, simply because POSIX did not bother making a decision
> about SIG_IGN.

After more thought, I wish to retract this statement as it is not true. I
apologize for confusing POSIX compliance with POSIX compatibility.

Marc.

+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| Marc Aurele La France | work: 1-403-492-9310 |
| Computing and Network Services | fax: 1-403-492-1729 |
| 352 General Services Building | email: tsi@ualberta.ca |
| University of Alberta +-----------------------------------+
| Edmonton, Alberta | |
| T6G 2H1 | Standard disclaimers apply |
| CANADA | |
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.065 / U:2.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site