Messages in this thread |  | | From | LD Landis <> | Subject | Re: On SIGCHLD signal semantics | Date | Tue, 18 Jun 1996 14:35:27 -0500 (CDT) |
| |
Hi,
Eh, hem... I sure would oppose having differences for the "heck of it". If POSIX isn't clear, then I'd recommend that the semantics of all "main line" implementations be sized up.. I'd rather see SV than BSD behavior since SV is more likely to be true across the realm including DG/UX, AIX, Solaris, HP/UX, Digital UNIX and other OSF/1. Also, it is more likely that POSIX will adopt something like that (SV).
Michiel Boland wrote: > Marc wrote: > >First, applications that set their SIGCHLD handler to SIG_IGN are not > >inherently broken. They are simply expecting System V semantics. > But Linux is not System V. Linux is Linux. Ergo: these > applications are broken. Full stop. > -- > Michiel Boland <boland@sci.kun.nl> > University of Nijmegen > The Netherlands >
-- Cheers, --ldl ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- LD Landis ldl@HealthPartners.Com N0YRQ Voice 612/883-5511 Fax 612/883-6363 HealthPartners, 8100 34th Avenue So, PO Box 1309, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1309 Shape your life not from your memories, but from your hopes. (Borrowed) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  |