[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Ideas for v2.1
> As a SCSI user, I put my vote in for using a naming convention
> like: c0t0l0 (controller, target (device), LUN)
> but what about the _FUTURE_?? Ultra SCSI devices can be dynamically
> reconfigured by software to a different target number. Or will Linux
> decide now to _NEVER_ use such a feature?

Or what about a person with two removeable media SCSI drives. It
would be nice it the mountpoint could be specific to the actual
removeable disk so it doesn't matter which removeable drive the disk
is mounted in.
Dwight Hubbard
MCI ISN Tech Support MCIMAIL: 200-1654

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.046 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site