[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Is it "stable" or "experimental"?
On Sat, 15 Jun 1996, Harvey Fishman wrote:

> If 2.0 is stable, why does the make config script still have a question
> about experimental drivers? If this is REALLY stable, should there be any
> experimental drivers in the configuration? Or am I missing something very
> basic?

To quote Linus, "An experimental driver is better than no driver at all."
That is why the experimental features/drivers are included in 2.0.

In short, 2.0 is a "stable" kernel, except, perhaps, the things marked

Actually, you may find many of the experimental features to be quite
stable. Isn't Linux amazing?!

William E. Roadcap
TITUS Software
Waynesboro, Va (USA)

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.041 / U:4.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site