[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Ideas for v2.1

As a SCSI user, I put my vote in for using a naming convention
like: c0t0l0 (controller, target (device), LUN)
but what about the _FUTURE_?? Ultra SCSI devices can be dynamically
reconfigured by software to a different target number. Or will
Linux decide now to _NEVER_ use such a feature?

P.S. People, please keep quoting to a minimum...some threads are
getting ridiculous. A friendly reminder :-)

Andrew E. Mileski My home page
Linux Plug-and-Play Project Leader. See URL

Red Hat Software sponsors these pages - I have no other affilitation
with Red Hat Software, and I have never used any of their products.

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.048 / U:2.984 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site