Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 15 Jun 1996 22:50:13 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Alan V. Shackelford" <> | Subject | Re: make |
| |
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Daniel Lehnberg wrote:
> Isn't it a nice make patch at the end of the release-note? > And variables names are removed but not there relative location in a > struct and if you think you're useing the right field (since two shared > the same value) of a struct , but you managed to use the wrong one , if > it's corected in a later edition of the shared-lib you get another file > length (ie. to big/small filename) you get the strange result that you > had in make. > It's all rather basic programming knowledge IMHO (at least in this > maillist :) > You arrogant twit. Attitudes like yours cause big trouble for people who are just getting started in this stuff. Just keep it up, and pretty soon no one but seasoned programmers will be able to run this kernel and get any real work done. Won't that be nice? You can have it all for yourself. I swear if I hear many more of you saying "it's really just basic programming" I'm gonna wipe this disk and start learning NT or something. Sure it's fun to learn new stuff, and explore as you grow, but the basic guts of the system (ie. the kernel, make, and a reasonable mail delivery system) should drop in and work, right out of the box. All your pompous remarks won't change that basic fact.
Now, one of you guys who DOES understand the inside workings of this system, please sit down and provide simple, concise, 1-2-3 insstructions on how to:
1). fix make 2). fix sendmail 3). fix uugetty
I know, it's in the docs. So interpret the docs for us, so we can get back on line. Thanks.
One net to rule them all, one net to find them, one net to bring them all and using Unix bind them. alan_s@shaknet.clark.net
|  |