Messages in this thread |  | | From | (James M. Cassidy) | Subject | Re: PProbablem with 'make' | Date | Sat, 15 Jun 96 17:42:23 EDT |
| |
> > Amazingly enough James M. Cassidy said: > > I read the release notes with the libc upgrade and it says make might be > > broke with the new dirent structure. I even tried recompiled make (Which I > > mainly had to do by hand) but I still got the same errors from the new binary. > > Well, if you poke around on sunsite and tsx-11, you can find > precompiled versions of make.... > > Either way, you shouldn't have to do anything "by hand." Make > comes with a method of building itself assuming you have no > previous version of make. > > Are you sure you're running the new make you built and not the > old one? Positive it got installed? Or you trying to run that > one by copying the binary wherever you might need it? Run "which > make" to see for sure. If you didn't install it, you're probably > running the old version. Most systems either do not put current > dir in the path, or make sure it's the last thing in the path, so > unless you either do something like ./make or install the new > one, you will run the old one.
I did make and I even moved the old binary to a new name.
> > Outside of that, I've never had a problem. > > mrc > -- > Mike Castle .-=NEXUS=-. Life is like a clock: You can work constantly > mcastle@cs.umr.edu and be right all the time, or not work at all > mcastle@umr.edu and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc > We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen >
|  |