Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Graham Mitchell" <> | Date | Fri, 14 Jun 1996 01:52:21 +0000 | Subject | Re: Ideas for v2.1 |
| |
On 13 Jun 96 at 12:28, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> So, lets see, how it is currently: > > I have > > /dev/hda -> IDE > /dev/sda -> SCSI ID0 > /dev/sdb -> SCSI ID3 > /dev/sdc -> SCSI ID4 > /dev/sdd -> SCSI ID5 > > Now I remove SCSI ID3. 'drive does not spin underwater error' > > /dev/sda -> SCSI ID0 > /dev/sdb -> SCSI ID4 > /dev/sdc -> SCSI ID5 > > :-( > > Not too different from the scheme you criticized above. But it is > already in there. And IMHO it sucks. :-(
I know..... I'd like to see something like the old SysVr4 naming scheme based on controllers, disks and partitions.... It was a bit of a pain in the ass till you got used to it, but at least the drive names never changed.
Graham ---------------------------------------------------------- The world isnt run by weapons any more, or energy or money Its run by little 1s and 0s, little bits of data Its all just electrons ----------------------------------------------------------
|  |