lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc.
On Wed, 12 Jun 1996, Alan Cox wrote:

> > > Make that a chargeable group and we get the ability to partition a big
> > > machine up by department and to do sensible charging schemes. For big number
> > > crunchers that is an issue.
> > A wonderful idea. Would imposing a memory usage quota be a extrememly
> > difficult task, Alan?
>
> I can see some semantics issues like who do you charge for a shared page,
> both, half each, ... (I like half each as it will encourage people to run
> two of the same job at once as its cheaper on machine resources!)
>
> Alan
>

You could always ignore shared memory to get this out the door. :-)

--
Jeff Johnson GCS d- s: !a C+++ UA++(+++) P+ L+
trn@gate.net E---- W+++ N+++(+++++) K- w(+) O(-)
KE4QWX M- V-(--) PS+ PE Y++ PGP+++(+++++) t-
http://www.gate.net/~trn 5 X+++(+++++) R tv+ b++ DI-- D G++ e* !h r y?
Nerdity Test = 66% Hacker Test = 45%
1024/3397E001 1995/06/10 5B 92 8B 34 84 E9 42 26 DC FB F7 C4 1E 0E 80 29



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.140 / U:2.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site