Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 10 Jun 1996 09:46:33 -0600 (CST) | From | Aaron Ucko <> | Subject | Re: New 2.0 web page |
| |
> > > You need to update your *Very* out of date page. > > > ld.so is 1.8.0, libc is 5.4.2, sysvinit 2.62 just to name a few. > > > > His page is right. libc5.4.2 ld.so 1.8.0 are TEST software. I was very > > impressed with the page and it will put you in the right place. > > > > Dont run libc5.4.x unless you are on the gcc list and want fun > > > > Alan > >This reminds me, there is one small problem with >linux/Documentation/Changes in reference to the version of libg++ you >should use. In the process of my recent upgrade I installed libc 5.2.18 >and libg++ 2.7.1.4; I found that C++ programs then produced amazingly >bogus output. It turns out that libg++ 2.7.1.3 is what you should use >with libc 5.2.18; libg++ 2.7.1.4 _must_ be used with libc 5.3.x. The >Changes file should suggest libg++ 2.7.1.3 instead.
By a similar token, I'm still using binutils 2.6.0.2 because version 2.6.0.14 says it requires libc 5.3.something, and managing just fine.
-- Aaron Ucko (ucko@vax1.rockhurst.edu; finger for PGP public key) | httyp! "That's right," he said. "We're philosophers. We think, therefore we am." -- Terry Pratchett, _Small Gods_ | Geek Code 3.1 [for explanation, finger hayden@mankato.msus.edu]: GCS/M/S/C d- s: a18 C++(+++)>++++ UL++>++++ P++ L++>+++++ E- W(-) N++(+) o+ K- w--- O M@ V-(--) PS++(+++) PE- Y(+) PGP(+) t(+) !5 X-- R(-) tv-@ b++(+++) DI+ !D-- G++(+++) e->+++++(*) h!>+ r-(--)>+++ y?
|  |