[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: packages and the kernel
> On Fri, 31 May 1996, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> (clip)
> >
> > More radical: Have a filesystem that can be mounted with two different
> > directory structures, the package view and the user view. From the
> > package view, root installs software packages by putting each one in
> > its own directory. Root marks each file with a type (like the Mac).
> > Files marked as type bin automatically show up in /usr/bin and they
> > disappear when removed from the package view. You might have to give
> > up hard links, but that is a good idea anyway (for reverse lookups).


> Kernel side : if you are going to use the kernel, keep track of all package
> files by what 'package' they belong to in the same way you track user/group.
> Now, you still need distributions, but:
> Rules:
> 1. A file created by standard methods would belong to the package the


> 2. files made by login shells belong to a 'package' of the user's name. (this won't get


> 3. new file creation functions or fcntl stuff can be made to allow users


and 4, 5, 6, ...

> current dist. methods... the umsdos type kludge, with an eye for eventual
Please, think Un*x, keep this to somewhere off-topic, like
huge-kernel-useless-overhead ;-)

Sorry, just don't like it,

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.057 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site