[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: On the topic of noisy drivers...
On Tue, 7 May 1996, David A Willmore wrote:
> I'll state this once more for a final bit of clarity. I have absolutely no
> qualms with printing out large amounts of debugging information on bootup.
> Since it's for debugging, it's for people with knowlege of the system. Since
> the knowlegable people are going to read it, it would be fine to compact it
> some or shorten some of the comments and spacing. Cryptic is fine. Taking a
> whole line to say that a SCSI device is a direct-access SCSI-1 CCS drive is
> rediculious. My final point is that some of us have limited options when it
> comes to scrollback. If the 'debugging' information scrolls of the screen
> before it can be read, it's not too useful for debugging, is it?

What might be a better idea is to have some levels of debugging set at
boot time via LILO. I gather that this wouldn't be too hard to implement.
This means you would be able to set a range 0-9, where 0 is nothing, and
9 the noisiest. This would solve everyone's problems.

echo '16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D3F204445524F42snlbxq'|dc
# +---------------- FROM: Mick J Hellstrom -----------------+
# | | Software Engineer |
# | | R/T Embedded Applications |
# | Phone:428 9953 | Linux does it all! |
# | Scitec Pty Ltd | Venimus, Vidimus, Dolavimus|
# | #include <stdDisclaimer.h> | Cruci dum spiro fido |
# +----------------------------+----------------------------+
echo ""
echo "I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception."
echo "- Groucho Marx"
echo "I have had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it."
echo "- Groucho Marx"

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.026 / U:9.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site