[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: memory
On Sun, 05 May 1996 20:12:13 +0200, Alain Knaff writes:
> Probably they meant that Linux' buffer cache is more efficient than
>_caching disk controllers_ . Which is true. However, you still need to
>have a decent amount of SRAM memory cache. Just don't put it on your
>IDE controller :)
> Alain

I get significant performance increases with a caching IDE controller...
they are well worth the money IMO.. :P

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.063 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site