Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: memory | Date | Tue, 07 May 1996 18:00:03 -0400 | From | Joseph Dickson <> |
| |
On Sun, 05 May 1996 20:12:13 +0200, Alain Knaff writes: > > Probably they meant that Linux' buffer cache is more efficient than >_caching disk controllers_ . Which is true. However, you still need to >have a decent amount of SRAM memory cache. Just don't put it on your >IDE controller :) > > Alain >
I get significant performance increases with a caching IDE controller... they are well worth the money IMO.. :P
merlin@sj-coop.net
|  |