Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 7 May 1996 14:35:16 -0500 | From | David A Willmore <> | Subject | Re: dropping kerneld... |
| |
On May 1, 2:27am, Lauri Tischler wrote: > I have said before that kerneld _might_ have a place somewhere where > underpowered hardware is the _only_ choise. (compare travelling 3000 > km's with bicycle instead by airplane). > > Saving 100-300 kilobytes of memory is truly not worth the hassle in > any 'normal' systems.
Oh, please enlighten me as to what is considered a normal system. Is my 8 meg 486DX4/120 a normal system? Is my 4 meg 386DX/16 a normal system? What is normal?
Until someone has a good suggestion regarding a replacement for kerneld, I don't see much point in discusing removing it.
Cheers, David
|  |