[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: dropping kerneld...
On May 1,  2:27am, Lauri Tischler wrote:
> I have said before that kerneld _might_ have a place somewhere where
> underpowered hardware is the _only_ choise. (compare travelling 3000
> km's with bicycle instead by airplane).
> Saving 100-300 kilobytes of memory is truly not worth the hassle in
> any 'normal' systems.

Oh, please enlighten me as to what is considered a normal system. Is my 8 meg
486DX4/120 a normal system? Is my 4 meg 386DX/16 a normal system? What is

Until someone has a good suggestion regarding a replacement for kerneld, I
don't see much point in discusing removing it.


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.028 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site